Governance / E-Government
Case Studies
Region
Policy Areas

Description

E-Government is the delivery of government services online[1][2], this section discusses this digitalised public service by 1) introducing the service scope, 2) development stages, and 3) the potential challenges.

The scope of e-government consists of two types of digital management applications: internal and external / front-end. Internal applications for e-government (Government to Government services, G2G) include information and communication technology (ICT) solutions to optimise internal processes involving data sharing and electronic exchanges between various governmental agencies, such as data encryption and transfer, document retrieval and processing, and other administrative functions in governments[3][4]. G2G services are the backbone of e-Government, and the central and local governments should therefore prioritise upgrading their own internal systems and procedures, before introducing digital transactions with citizens and businesses.

As for external / front-end applications, e-government provides a communication service between the government and citizens (Government to citizens, G2C) or businesses (Government to Business, G2B). Digital technologies can improve the efficiency and accuracy of the communication between the city administration and its citizens/businesses or within the city administration itself. This improves government transparency and public services provision, including information or transactions via websites, citizen hotlines, handling applications online or in kiosks, tracking application status by mobile or website, registering a property, paying taxes, etc.

These digital interactions reduce costs, time and barriers by facilitating the interaction between citizens and companies with their local government entities. For instance, public services can be referred to a single point of access online where procedures are simplified and citizens do not need to commute to a physical office for such transactions. Digital solutions also offer better document and record management enabling both the public and the government to handle the processes in a more efficient way.

E-government initiatives overall reshape the relationship between city governments and the public. In all of the different development stages, these digital services promote governmental transparency and lay the groundwork for an ecosystem in which citizen participation occurs, shifting citizens’ role from reactive to proactive.

The next stage[5] – vertical integration is about the connection of central and local governments to provide a better integrated service, where the compatibility and interoperability between different government databases will be one of the main challenges.

The final and most complex stage – horizontal integration fully integrates public administration in different departments, for various functions and at different levels of the government system allowing the general public to receive government information and services online through a one-stop-shop. This last deployment stage provides a closer integration across authorities and regions within a country but also implies a significantly larger financial investment than the aforementioned development stages.

Resource Implications and Key Requirements

Infrastructure

The readiness of ICT infrastructure is critical to the e-government performance as the services are all digitalised, and hosted on the Internet. Hence, the quality and citizen’s satisfaction of government services provided are subject to a city’s digital maturity.

Leadership

The leadership with a clear vision plays a vital role in enabling the e-government initiatives[6]. Policymakers must understand a digitalised government and be accountable to promote the digitalisation of all city authorities with a clear long-term vision.

For instance, to ensure the quality of services provided, the Seoul Metropolitan Government established its own telecom network linking 16 affiliated organizations and built a total of 477 types of information systems including all the municipal services housing for its 127 divisions. It also set up a specific e-government promotion group led by the chief information officer (CIO) with 195 employees in 4 divisions and 1 data centre. The Seoul Data Centre is built upon 89 information protection systems, 973 servers, and 272 telecom equipment for integrated control of the systems[7].

Financial implication

The cost of e-government establishment varies on the services provision, size of programmes, and advancement of the digital system. Nevertheless, there is consensus that the more advanced forms of E government establishment represent significant upfront expenditures in technology and training. For instance, Kyiv’s e-procurement system, ProZorro, cost about 4.69 million Euros including the 2014 inception of the program to its 2017 implementation. Where the setup costs were about 1.23 million Euros, implementation costs 560,000 Euros, and operation for 2.90 million Euros[8]. In the case of Decide Madrid[9], an e-participation platform was established in 2015 aiming to improve transparency of government procedures and expand public participation in policy decision-making and spending. The annual budget of the platform is almost 2 million Euros.

Legal

Assurance of data security is fundamental for e-government. City governments should not only employ suitable technical methods and reliable tools, but also implement well-integrated regulations (solid security and privacy protocols) to protect security and privacy.

Other recommendations

According to 2001 UN Benchmarking E-government, the survey on 144 UN Member States suggests some of the following insights:

  • Online service delivery is complementary rather than the ultimate replacement of all conventional service delivery.
  • User interest is important in promoting the access to and usage of e-government.
  • Single Entry Portals is a key factor in the success of local e-government.

Potential Private Sector Participation

E-government initiatives improve the cities’ relationships not only with the public, but also with other stakeholders of the private sector including enterprises and the media.

Private contractors can engage in the design, financing, supplying, operating and maintenance of E-government services. IT developers have a particularly important role to play in the design and development of solutions. As the maintenance and overall effectiveness of E-government initiatives depends on these workers, IT developers should be involved in decision making processes.

The city government should also incentivise a proactive engagement & involvement from the part of IT developers and can do so by ensuring a competitive salary or remuneration for the digital services provided. This incentive should also extend to the public, where citizen’s participation is crucial for the efficiency of E-Government services.

The lack of public awareness on how government processes or policies are made would hold back the citizens to engage in government services. Additionally, data privacy concerns may arise when tendering public information to private entities. Moreover, those who are less likely to have Internet access usually have a higher demand to interact with the government (e.g., elderly, poor, less educated, etc.). Learning from the past experience of the London borough of Hillingdon, UK, it suggested a proactive and strong marketing campaign at both the local and central government levels is needed to raise public awareness of e-government via workshops and seminars[9].

Implementation Obstacles and Possible Solutions

Inadequate Infrastructure, High Costs and a Digital Divide [10]

Insufficient ICT infrastructure remains a major challenge to the establishment of e-government. Cities in particular, including those in developing regions without adequate ICT infrastructure (e.g., poor connectivity) face difficulties to implement new technologies. Another obstacle is the high costs to adopt new technologies. Shortages of financial resources deter cities from e-government initiatives.

Moreover, even if government budgets cover the expense of e-government establishment, the cost of internet access for citizens may prevent them from public online services, especially to those who do not find it affordable. Poor internet signals in remote areas is also a challenge, which results in a huge digital divide not only within a city but between regions and people.

Cloud services may be one of economical options for public services in a shared and coordinated manner. Cities can subscribe to or lease suitable services instead of purchasing hardware and software. Cooperating with the private sector is another way to reduce the cost pressure on e-government development. To lower costs for users accessing online public services, cities can provide free Wi-Fi in some public spaces (e.g., transport stations, tourist hotspots), kiosks, or the existing public facilities (e.g., libraries).

Lack of Skilled Workers, Paradigm Shift, and Managing Bureaucratic Processes

Having a sufficient number of skilled workers is essential to fully realise the benefits of a city’s e-government. Having enough qualified staff to manage e-government initiatives or daily operations remains a barrier for many cities. Another common obstacle is the staff's resistance to change in roles and responsibilities and showing reluctance to switch to new working approaches[11].

Strengthening digital literacy and targeted digital skills among employees (either potential or existing) should be a priority. It can be fulfilled through knowledge sharing and training within government, or support from the experts of legal and technology in the private sector or local communities. To assist its staff in working through a procurement procedure, San Francisco introduced an internal procurement chatbot (PAIGE) to guide the process and clear up questions by the public[12].

References

[1] V. Weerakkody and J. Choudrie (2005) "Exploring E-Government in the UK: Challenges, Issues and Complexities". Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239919201_Exploring_E-Government_in_the_UK_Challenges_Issues_and_Complexities

[2] J. Awotwi and C. Amega-Selorm (2015) "A case Study of an African e-Government/e-Governance Development". Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2846012.2846040

[3] Y.A.B. El-Ebiary, N.A. Al-Sammarraie, S.I.A. Saany (2019) “E-Government Challenges and Possibilities by using Information and Communication Technologies in Malaysian Governance”. Available at: https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v8i1C2/A12010581C219.pdf

[4] V. Weerakkody and J. Choudrie (2005) "Exploring E-Government in the UK: Challenges, Issues and Complexities". Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239919201_Exploring_E-Government_in_the_UK_Challenges_Issues_and_Complexities

[5] Z. Irani, M. Al-Sebie and T. Elliman (2006) “Transaction Stage of e-Government Systems: Identification of Its Location and Importance”. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4216152_Transaction_Stage_of_e-Government_Systems_Identification_of_Its_Location_and_Importance

[6] ibid

[7] United Nation (2001) “Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective”. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/English.pdf

[8] V. Weerakkody and J. Choudrie (2005) "Exploring E-Government in the UK: Challenges, Issues and Complexities". Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239919201_Exploring_E-Government_in_the_UK_Challenges_Issues_and_Complexities

[9] V. Weerakkody and J. Choudrie (2005) "Exploring E-Government in the UK: Challenges, Issues and Complexities". Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239919201_Exploring_E-Government_in_the_UK_Challenges_Issues_and_Complexities

[10] Z. Irani, M. Al-Sebie and T. Elliman (2006) “Transaction Stage of e-Government Systems: Identification of Its Location and Importance”. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4216152_Transaction_Stage_of_e-Government_Systems_Identification_of_Its_Location_and_Importance

[11] ibid

[12] United Nation (2001) “Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective”. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/English.pdf

[13] V. Weerakkody and J. Choudrie (2005) "Exploring E-Government in the UK: Challenges, Issues and Complexities". Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239919201_Exploring_E-Government_in_the_UK_Challenges_Issues_and_Complexities

[14] Churin Kim and Kyung-ah Kim (2021) “The Institutional Change from E-Government toward Smarter City; Comparative Analysis between Royal Borough of Greenwich, UK, and Seongdong-gu, South Korea”

[15] Seoul Metropolitan Government (2015) “Seoul, ready to share with the world! Seoul e-Government". Available at: http://susa.or.kr/sites/default/files/resources/Seoul%20e-Government%20%28English%29.pdf

[16] World Bank (2017) “OPEN GOVERNMENT CASE STUDY: Costing the ProZorro e-Procurement Program”. Available at: https://www.r4d.org/wp-content/uploads/R4D_OG-ProZorro-CS_web.pdf

[17] United Nation (2020) “E-Government Survey 2020”. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2020-Survey/2020%20UN%20E-Government%20Survey%20(Full%20Report).pdf

[18] V. Weerakkody and J. Choudrie (2005) "Exploring E-Government in the UK: Challenges, Issues and Complexities". Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239919201_Exploring_E-Government_in_the_UK_Challenges_Issues_and_Complexities

[19] United Nation (2020) “E-Government Survey 2020”. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2020-Survey/2020%20UN%20E-Government%20Survey%20(Full%20Report).pdf

[20] V. Weerakkody and J. Choudrie (2005) "Exploring E-Government in the UK: Challenges, Issues and Complexities". Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239919201_Exploring_E-Government_in_the_UK_Challenges_Issues_and_Complexities

[21] United Nations (2020) “E-Government Survey 2020”. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2020-Survey/2020%20UN%20E-Government%20Survey%20(Full%20Report).pdf